“Not Interested in Being #1:” Shanghai May Ditch PISA
“Not interested in #1 on International Tests, Focusing on Reducing Academic Burden: Shanghai May Drop Out of PISA” is the headline of a story in Xinmin Wanbao[original story in Chinese], a popular newspaper in Shanghai. Published on March 7th 2014, the story reports that Shanghai “is considering to withdraw from the next round of PISA in 2015” because “Shanghai does not need so-called ‘#1 schools,’” said Yi Houqin, a high level official of Shanghai Education Commission. “What it needs are schools that follow sound educational principles, respect principles of students’ physical and psychological development, and lay a solid foundation for students’ lifelong development,” says the article, quoting Mr. Yi.
One of the shortfalls of Shanghai education masked by its top PISA ranking, Mr. Yi, pointed out, is excessive amount of homework, according to the story. For example, teachers in Shanghai spend 2 to 5 hours designing, reviewing, analyzing, and discussing homework assignment every day. “Over half of the students spend more than one hour on school work after school [every day]; Teachers’ estimate of homework load is much lower than actual experiences of students and parents; Although the homework is not particularly difficult, much of it is mechanical and repetitive tasks that take lots of time; Furthermore, our teachers are more used to mark the answers as ‘right’ or ‘wrong,’ while students are hoping their teachers can help them open their minds and point out their problems.”
“Homework is only one of the elements that supports student development,” an unnamed PISA official told Xinmin Wanbao. “Their skills and qualities should also be acquired from a variety of activities such as play, online activities, and games instead of merely completing academic assignments or extending homework time.”
“Shanghai will not participate in PISA forever,” Professor Zhang Minxuan, director of PISA in China, told another Shanghai newspaper Xinwen Chenbao in December 2013[original story in Chinese]. “It will develop its own [education quality] evaluation system.”
The evaluation system Professor Zhang alluded to is the so-called “green evaluation” I blogged about previously. The new evaluation system deemphasizes the significance of test scores. Instead of being the sole measure of educational quality, test scores become one of 10 indicators Shanghai (and China) will use to evaluate schools. The new evaluation system will measure student motivation and engagement, student-teacher relationship, and physical fitness, according to Xinwen Chenbao.
Whether or when Shanghai decides to drop PISA is unknown and dependent on many factors, political consideration being one. But it is clear that Shanghai officials have acknowledged that PISA does not give them what they want. Its narrow definition of education quality as test scores obscures other aspects of education that are much more important.
Moreover, it seems that the #1 status has given Shanghai education officials much headache, according to a leading education policy researcher in Shanghai, who spoke to me on condition of anonymity recently. He believes that Shanghai’s success in PISA has backfired. “People know very well our education is no good, but when you don’t boast as the world’s best, they leave you alone. Now you claim to be the best, people begin to question you and expose all the problems that you cannot solve.” The government does not want that and “thus wants to get out of it.”
(No Ratings Yet)
Loading ...
Keep education about the kids, NOT about BUSINESS!!! >:(
[...] complaints about them. Yong Zhao, a former ALOED book club author, describes, on his blog, how Shanghai, recently ranked #1 on the PISA (Program for International Student Assessment) tests may drop out [...]
Thank you for this post! I have added it to a collection on high-stakes testing here: http://www.scoop.it/t/testing-testing
[...] By YongZhao “Not interested in #1 on International Tests, Focusing on Reducing Academic Burden: Shanghai May Drop Out of PISA” is the headline of a story in Xinmin Wanbao[original story in Chinese], a popular newspaper in Shanghai. Published on March 7th 2014, the story reports that Shanghai “is considering to withdraw from the next round of PISA in 2015” because “Shanghai does not need so-called ‘#1 schools,’” said Yi Houqin, a high level official of Shanghai Education Commission. “What it needs are schools that follow sound educational principles, respect principles of students’ … Read the full article [...]
[...] complaints about them. Yong Zhao, a former ALOED book club author, describes, on his blog, how Shanghai, recently ranked #1 on the PISA (Program for International Student Assessment) tests may drop out [...]
[...] Education evaluation [...]
[...] or two from Younge’s article when I came across a recent piece from the always-interesting Yong Zhao about how Shanghai is considering whether to have anything more to do with PISA and withdrawing [...]
Among the top 5 in PISA, there are only 2 systems as far as I know: One is the Asian system (China, Singapore, Korea, Japan …. ) which is exams-centric. The other is the Finnish education system with little emphasis on exams.
All Asian countries are talking about less exams, less homework, less out-of-school tuition …. But it is simply NOT possible to change education VALUES by changing education system. It requires legislative process of many other aspects to shape social values.
In the case of Finland, they passed several important laws in late 1970s. One such legislation is to make it illegal to have any form of selection process in education system. Another is to pay teachers high salary. After 30+ years, the Finnish education system took shape and shined.
[...] this piece from a recent blog by author Yong Zhao. You can see his entire blog HERE. The evaluation system Professor Zhang alluded to is the so-called ‘green evaluation’ I [...]
Very interesting report. I have just begun to look into secondary education reforms planned for Chinese schools and students. This is an extremely important topic and I look forward to reading more articles by Dr. Zhao. Thank you for your work.
Feel free to comment:
The views expressed on this site are entirely my own. They do not represent my employer or any other organization/institution. All comments are subject to approval.Archive
09.20.17 Torture is not Good Education: A Response to WSJ’s Why American Students Need Chinese Schools
09.09.17 The Courage to be Creative: My Interview with the Deep-Play Research Group
09.06.17 Fatal attraction: Why Copying Each Other Won’t Improve Education?
02.17.17 What Works Can Hurt: Side Effects in Education
12.19.16 [video]Perils or Promises: Education in the Age of Smart Machines: Presentation at the City Club of Cleveland
12.07.16 Did the Shift from Paper to Computer Bring Down East Asia’s (China’s) PISA Performance?
12.05.16 Don’t Read Too Much Into It: What Brexit and U.S. Election Surprises Can Teach Us about PISA
12.01.16 Never Send a Human to do a Machine’s Job: Top 5 Mistakes in Ed Tech
11.30.16 Stop Copying Others: TIMSS Lessons for America
11.29.16 It must be the chopsticks: The Less Reported Findings of 2015 TIMSS and Explaining the East Asian Outstanding Performance
10.08.16 From Deficiency to Strength: Shifting the Mindset about Education Inequality
12.07.15 Are American Students Over-tested: Schleicher vs. Schleicher
10.25.15 Never Send a Human to do a Machine’s Job: Top 5 Mistakes in Ed Tech
07.20.15 Outcome vs. Process: Different Incarnations of Personalization
06.19.15 Lessons that Matter: What should we learn from Asia’s school systems?
Tag Cloud
Accountability achievement gap CCSSO China/Chinese Commissioner Common Core Standards education Educational Policy Education Reforms national standards New York NGA Singapore standardized testing Standards student performance
WP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck and Luke Morton requires Flash Player 9 or better.
Most Commented
Most Viewed
Views expressed on this site are entirely personal. They do not necessarily represent the official positions or views of my employer
Powered by WordPress | Log in | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Arthemia theme by Michael Hutagalung