Video: No Child Left Behind and Global Competitiveness
7 August 2009
14,906
18 Comments
Ed Week Post about this video: http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/curriculum/2009/08/michigan_scholar_questions_com.html
Will more standards, accountability, and higher test scores make American students more globally competitive? In the video, Yong Zhao retells his personal story and questions the wisdom of current US education policy. He argues that global competitiveness comes from a diversity of talents and recognition of individual passions and creativity. This is part of a film series produced by the Mobile Learning Institute’s called “A 21st Century Education”
Get the Flash Player to see this content.













(6 votes, average: 4.67 out of 5)
Thank you for sharing your story Yong Zhao.
You gave a great history lesson and helped to solve the problem of how to get us out an education system based on test scores.
But more importantly, you showed a way out of the current system and show the perfect alternative.
I agree with all you said 100%!
Mr. Zhao,
What a refreshing way of looking at the world, and education’s place in it! Will you please come to Oklahoma and convince our legislators that children and youth are not automatons? You have the same philosophy that I, a board of education member, have: If the gifted musician or painter has to master higher math, why does not the gifted mathematician have to become expert on the trumpet?
After you change the attitudes of Oklahoma legislators, please go on the Washington D.C.!
That was supposed to say ON to Washington D. C.
Thank you or saying what needed to be said. I will always be a fan of high school sports,but the music department is just as important. Everybody is not giong to be great chemist or mathemiticians, so why force them. you should not limit your scope to just math and science. Sooner or later the banker will need a mechanic to repair his car.
It would be interesting to see a blog post from Dr. Zhao about Thomas Friedman blaming education for the financial collapse: http://tinyurl.com/ygg2qbg
Nice website with good content, congratulation !
vente vtt
Thank you Dr. Zhao for sharing your thoughts on the standardization of American schools. It is indeed sad to think the nation that placed a man on the moon, and has led the world in creativity and innovation for over a century is ready to follow the rest rather than lead the world in Education. Our children are so much more than a test score.
Sincerely,
Jesse P. Turner
Director of the Central Connecticut State University Literacy Center
Yong Zhao, you make a lot of sense.
For an elementary principal trying to cope in the midst of our “dangerously irrelevant” system your observations are a breath of fresh air!! Our cultural fixation on the ‘hard’ subjects (and sports) and our governments obsession with standards and statistics are driving our education systems into the realm of ridiculousness and irrelevancy!
Dr. Yong Zhao is totally on target! How can we get out leaders to comprehend his sane logic? Thank You Dr. Zhao for creating this video!
I think Dr. Zhao does not get it. I will not comment on how well No Child Left Behind has been implemented, because I suspect that is has not been done very well.
I will say that what my background in engineering, science, business and art and design have taught me that “structure sets you free”. Education begins with tests, not ends there.
Tests are important because everyone needs a minimum level of knowledge to be a functioning adult and good citizen. But a good basic foundation of academic knowledge does not prevent you from learning more on any topic that interests you, does not impose “reason” upon you, and doesn’t prevent you from charting your own course in life. However, illiteracy, ignorance of history, and inability to balance your checkbook does.
I say this having worked for 11 years as a chemical engineer in capital projects and product development, 3 years as a management consultant in high tech product development, a lifetime as an artist in many mediums and a mother of two. I also credit my success to a Montessori education.
People commonly say that an idea is bad when in reality the idea may be good but the implementation of an idea may be flawed. Creating processes and implementations that work is why good consultants make so much money.
I believe Dr. Zhao would agree with you Michele when you say, “structure sets you free.” He says momentarily in the above clip that you can’t just let kids go completely free. Having gone to Montessori myself, I believe Montessori exemplifies what Dr. Zhao is advocating for. He talks about talent shows and project based learning which is very reminiscent of the Montessori method. Having gone to school in American as well as in Japan and Taiwan I think he’s coming from the Asian pedagogy where they bring testing to the extreme. One failed test can mean utter ruin for the life of a child. In Japan student suicide is extremely high and bullying is very severe. There’s been a movement where children lock themselves in their rooms in fear of going to school. The word “hikikomori” (the word to describe this withdrawal) is a term now used in the UK. The goal here is to find a balance. Teaching for the left brain as well as for the right. Yes, testing is important (I for sure don’t want my doctor to have gotten through med school without taking tests). But it shouldn’t be weighed as heavily as it does.
P.S. As a filmmaker I live for that phrase- “structure sets you free.” Very important point! Wouldn’t know what I’d do without structure.
I am excited about working with Dr. Yong Zhou at the New Media Literacies Institute in Cambridge, MA. As a special ed teacher we live differentiated education, each student working to their potential. I just finished reading Distrupting Class and it will be interesting to talk with Yong Zhou about Clay Christensen’s ideas of online student centered education.
I’m a great fan of Dr. Zhao. He understands the need for fostering “21st Century Skills” for economic AND citizenship development. I’m saddened by a knee-jerk reaction such as “[he] doesn’t get it.” Truly he does. Our policy makers don’t seem to understand the importance of deep understanding and high cognitive learning–and the unpredictable, real-world applications of this learning. Testing has value; I support it. What I don’t support is using it as a gatekeeper without other input. As an educator, I’m sickened that my own daughter’s high school in Florida is centered on learning for the test (and it’s an “A” school). I’m working with her to gain a deeper understanding of content and the connections to the real world. Her test-prep schooling is not doing this. Keep up the good work, Dr. Zhao! We have a lot of educating to do in our communities, state houses, and Washington DC.
[...] to communicate with parents and others who are interested in the arts and humanities and to share the attached video from Yong Zhao. This is a very useful tool in convincing these folks of the importance of getting off the NCLB, [...]
BRAVO Michele Worden! I agree with you!
I saw Dr. Zhao yesterday and was deeply disturbed by his mixed messages and bashing of data.
As an administrator, a teacher, and a parent I need “data” in many forms to make sure a student or my child is not “left behind”….making sure each child grasps basic standard skills is necessary to be successful in life. (In the video clip above, he even says, “There are certain things that all children should learn”…wouldn’t that be the Common Core expectancies?)These skills, I feel, will be the structure of the Common Core. The Common Core will help all students with the basic standards they will need to succeed. It will also hold schools accountable for teaching these skills.
The key here is how they are implemented, which I agree, needs to be tweaked depending on where you are at and who you are working with. We/I understand all people learn in different ways…(thank you H. Gardner).
In no way do I see schools or families wiping out all other areas of “non-standardized” education (arts, PE, talent shows, bake sales, music…). The utilization of Common Core and No Child Left Behind (NCLB) is not going to turn the US into an extreme society with rigid educational standards that will rule every waking moment. It will, however, hold districts, schools, administrators, teachers, students, and parents accountable for what is or is not going on in classrooms nationwide. With this aligned, yet diverse set data points, we can start a conversation about what to do next based on the needs and strengths of each individual child.
Rich data is needed to gain insight into how our children are learning…the highs and the lows. Every test in school is not a one shot summative assessment. Rich formative data is needed to help guide the learners along their path. Good educators will utilize the strengths of a struggling student to help them succeed. Anything less is neglect. Without rich data, everything becomes a guessing game.
Data is very important Dr. Zhao, and it is the “Bean Counters” (as Dr. Zhao referred to yesterday), that help others to read the data and carefully navigate it, because data can be easily misread or misinterpreted. Yes, I agree that “data” has become a “new god” (as Dr. Zhao referred to yesterday), but with that power comes great responsibility to make sure you are presenting the whole picture, not a onetime snap shot.
I’m sure you have heard that Las Vegas has the highest unemployment rate in the nation. While the US sits at 9.1%, we sit at 14.3%. But, what most people don’t hear is who is in that group of unemployed. Within the group of unemployed people aged 25 and above, 15.7% are unemployed without a high school diploma, 9.8% are unemployed with a high school diploma, 7.9% are unemployed with some college or an associate degree, and 4.6% are unemployed with a bachelor’s degree or higher. Hmmm….I think this makes a strong statement about education. http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t04.htm
In the video clips Dr. Zhao makes it sound like all the people sitting out in front of Home Depot just need a pep talk…”You don’t need an education with standards. Be creative! Go follow your passion!” Clearly, that is not the case. http://www.npr.org/2010/11/12/131274822/low-skilled-workers-struggle-for-jobs-in-las-vegas
The Clark County School District has over 350 schools and over 309,000 students. Of the top 10 most populous school districts we are the only one to ever meet Annual Yearly Progress (AYP) in the last 4 years, and we have made AYP 3 out of those 4 years. We have magnet schools, trade schools, International Baccalaureate schools, specialized academies, online schools and numerous other schools that let students showcase their passions, but standards are a consistent factor for accountability of basic skills and proficiency.
Dr. Zhao, I had many questions for you yesterday, but you left the session early running out the door.
Dr. Zhao, do you not see the lack of continuity and balance in the US when it comes to education? I don’t feel we are moving toward Chinese educational rigidity, but as a nation we need a balanced alignment. NCLB and the Common Core are helping to achieve that balance across the nation.
Don’t throw data and testing out the window…seek a balance.
In closing, Dr. Zhao, I guess I’m just saddened by what I heard you say yesterday. What you said about me and my colleges, “The Bean Counters.” And no, I don’t make anything near the $110,000 salary you said I did. We are the ones who look at all the data and help find both the successes and struggles of over 309,000 students here in Clark County. We are the ones that help identify standard skills a student will need to succeed in life amidst an economical down turn. We help to make sure “no child is left behind” so they can go on to pursue whatever their passions might be. We are the ones who arm the students with the ability to “Lead the Way”.
What a concept! Build education on the individual strengths and not what tha system thinks is important. Build value, confidence and individual passion on what someone is great at and love to do.
Thank you for such an inspiring keynote at IETC. Loved all that you had to say. would love to get involved.
Feel free to comment:
The views expressed on this site are entirely my own. They do not represent my employer or any other organization/institution. All comments are subject to approval.Archive
02.08.12 U.S. Education in Chinese Lock Step? Bad Move. Chronicle of Higher Ed Commentary (B. Coppola & Y. Zhao)
12.19.11 The Difference between a $10,000 Education and a $10 Education
09.18.11 The Grass Is Greener: Learning from Other Countries
09.11.11 If Lady Gaga Can be Useful…
07.17.11 Ditch Testing (Part 5): Testing Has Not Improved Education Despite all the Costs
07.17.11 Ditch Testing (Part 4): Test Security Measures in China
07.16.11 Ditch Testing: Lessons from the Atlanta Scandal (Part 3): Human Nature?
07.16.11 Ditch Testing: Lessons from the Atlanta Cheating Scandal (Part 2): Not An Anomaly
07.14.11 Ditch Testing: Lessons from the Cheating Scandal in Atlanta (Part 1)
05.13.11 Can you be globally competitive by closing your doors and raising test scores?
03.27.11 Race to Self Destruction: A History Lesson for Education Reformers
03.10.11 A Nation At Risk: Edited by Yong Zhao
03.06.11 A Bold Education Experiment: What We Should Learn From China
02.26.11 Entrepreneurship and Creativity: Where Do They Come From and How Not to Destroy Them
01.30.11 “It makes no sense:” Puzzling over Obama’s State of the Union Speech
01.15.11 You must be joking, Professor Chua: An open letter to the Chinese Tiger Mom
01.01.11 Chinese version of Catching Up
12.29.10 John Richard Schrock: Why Doesn’t China Get Off the Teach-to-the-Test System?
12.10.10 A True Wake-up Call for Arne Duncan: The Real Reason Behind Chinese Students Top PISA Performance
12.04.10 The Value of a College Degree: High Test Scores, Low Ability
10.20.10 Cargo Cult Science: McKinsey’s Report on Teacher Recruitment
09.26.10 Who will invent the next Apple or Google: My (imaginary) speech at NBC’s Education Summit
09.14.10 Don’t Romanticize Testing in China
09.03.10 Master of Myth: What Arne Duncan Says and Does
07.21.10 NBC Hosting Education Summit: Can we stop bashing education?
06.19.10 What are high, really high, test scores worth: Competition among Schools in China
05.23.10 Mass Localism: How Might the Race to the Top Money Be Better Spent?
04.22.10 A Pretense of Science and Objectivity: Data and Race to the Top
04.02.10 Just in case you have not read, seen, or heard: a few links you may be interested in
03.30.10 A Discussion on China’s Recent Education Reform on CCTV 9
03.24.10 Does the U.S. Want what China Wants to Throw Away: The Role of Testing in Two National Education Reform Plans
03.09.10 Spring is Here(?): The New National Educational Technology Plan
03.04.10 Education Interfering with Instruction?
02.12.10 Reproducing Good Schools?
01.25.10 The Medium is the Message: Educating Generation M
01.19.10 Sesame vs. Watermelon: What is Missing in the National Standard Debate
12.05.09 Kappan Publishes my interview with Joan Richardson
11.30.09 Global Competitiveness Reinterpreted: Homogenization vs. Diversification
11.23.09 Change without Difference: China’s Struggle with Standardized Testing
11.16.09 Over the Top: Winning Strategies for the Race to the Top Fund
11.14.09 News and Interviews about my Book: Catching Up or Leading the Way
11.10.09 Lowering Standards in the US and “Hidden Rules” in China: Campbell’s Law and The Causes Education Corruption
11.02.09 U.S. Scientist and Engineer Supply as Strong as Ever: A New Study Finds
10.27.09 China Works on another Round of Education Reform to Foster Creative Talents
10.22.09 The Mismeasure of Education: Worthy Knowledge in the Age of Globalization
10.17.09 You will enjoy this: Not On the Test
10.12.09 WNYC’s Brian Lehrer Show Interview
10.09.09 “Created in China:” PRI’s The World Radio Series on Creativity in China
10.06.09 Education Week Reporter Writes about my Book
10.01.09 AASA Journal of Scholarship and Practice Publishes my comments on common core standards
09.25.09 Arne Duncan’s Mistaken View of Education and NCLB
09.24.09 Radio Interview with Peter Payette of Interlochen Public Radio
09.22.09 A Review of my Book by Anthony Cody
09.22.09 Here Goes another Myth about National Standards: Research Finds Little Evidence of Expectations Gap
09.14.09 When Education is not Education
09.11.09 Book released and sample chapters available on ASCD Website
09.10.09 Interview with Russ White about my book
09.10.09 Foreword for Richard Njus‘s New Book: Touching Hearts, Educating Minds
09.03.09 Nature Article: Interpreting International Test Scores: Is the U.S. Really Behind?
09.03.09 Letter from a mother: Response to my book press release
09.01.09 What do we want from our teachers: An Answer from Singapore
08.30.09 Detroit Free Press Op-ed: National education standards can end up hurting students
08.27.09 More about my book
08.27.09 Quick Update: China and 2 million minutes
08.14.09 Demystifying the Link between Performance on International Tests and Economic Competitiveness
08.13.09 Virtual May Not Be Physical, But It Is Real, At Least In Terms of Jobs
08.11.09 The Right to Choose What to Learn: High School Curriculum Reform in China
08.09.09 One step closer to standardization: Missouri to join common standards initiative
08.08.09 Interesting discussions about my video on Daily Kos
08.08.09 The Gardener Effect: Common Standards are Unfair and Exclusive
08.07.09 Article: Education in the Flat World
08.07.09 Video: Catching Up or Leading the Way
08.07.09 Video: No Child Left Behind and Global Competitiveness
08.06.09 Game: ZON/New Chengo: MMORG for Learning Chinese
08.06.09 Bio
08.06.09 Blog: National Education Standards without National Input
Tag Cloud
Accountability achievement gap CCSSO China/Chinese education Educational Policy Education Reforms national standards NGA Singapore standardized testing student performance
WP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck and Luke Morton requires Flash Player 9 or better.
Most Commented
Most Viewed
Views expressed on this site are entirely personal.They do not necessarily represent the official positions or views of my employer.